The groundwater allocation zone summary report for Makikihi
Recharge component
| Effective allocation: |
18.063 million m3/yr |
Valid date: |
22 February 2010 |
|
|
|
Method of estimation
Background notes
The Makikihi River, and its tributary Teschmakers Creek, both go dry in the middle reaches, and will provide a source of recharge, primarily to shallow aquifers adjacent to the river. Deeper aquifers will be primarily recharged from rainfall.
Thorley and Ettema have provided the latest assessment of the groundwater allocations limits for this area, including assessment of the nature of the recharge over loess strata. This has led to an adjustment of the boundary and a revised allocation limit for this zone. This has been incorporated via proposed NRRP Variation 4. New applications to take groundwater that is linked to a surface waterway may be subject to surface water restrictions and/or allocation.
Other available information sources
These reports may be used to provide a full description of groundwater resources in this area. They may include information that will be of use in a consent application, but are not necessarily a comprehensive list.
- Aitchison-Earl, P., Davey, G., Ettema, M., McKerchar, A., Scott, D., Smith, E., and Weeber, J.
'State of the Canterbury Region Water Resource October 2004' (pdf 3.83 MB), U04/101
- Aitchison-Earl, P. L. 2003, 'Pareora-Waihao water use patterns" report on data collected in 2000-2002' Environment Canterbury Unpublished Technical Report U03/84.
- Brown, L. J, 2000, 'Groundwaters of the Canterbury Region' Environment Canterbury Report R00/10.
- Waugh J .,1980. 'Draft Water Resources Investigation: Pareora, Otaio, Makikihi, Hook, Waihao, Waimate' South Canterbury Catchment Board.
- Thorley, M., Ettema, M. Review of water allocation limits for the South Canterbury downlands. Report U07/09. April 2007.
Allocation history
Effective allocation
3 May 2010
Effective Allocation (million m3): 18.06
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 100%
17 December 2007
Effective Allocation (million m3): 18.05
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 100%
3 December 2007
Effective Allocation (million m3): 17.85
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 99%
1 October 2007
Effective Allocation (million m3): 17.14
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 95%
3 September 2007
Effective Allocation (million m3): 15.67
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 87%
23 July 2007
Effective Allocation (million m3): 14.83
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 82%
7 May 2006
Effective Allocation (million m3): 11.12
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 70%
18 September 2006
Effective Allocation (million m3): 9.97
Reason for Change: Consents update
Source: Consents database live-read
Proportion Allocated: 63%
29 June 2005
Effective Allocation (million m3): 9.94
Reason for Change: Effective allocation recalculated using a revised table of irrigation standards to address concerns with Schedule WQN9 of Chapter 5 NRRP, as approved by the Water Allocation Panel
Source: Consents database live-read on 29 June 2005
Proportion Allocated: 63.00%
23 January 2004
Effective Allocation (million m3): 7.5
Reason for Change: No change
Source:
Proportion Allocated: 47.17%
Proportion Allocated due to Allocation Limit change
23 January 2004
Effective Allocation (million m3): 7.5
Reason for Change: This is the first estimate made
Source: 1st Order Report U04/02 (Table 6.2)
Proportion Allocated: 40.32%
Allocation Limit
23 June 2007
Allocation Limit (million m3): 18.05
Reason for Change: Changed boundary and revised estimate of land-surface recharge plus surface water recharge from the Makikihi
Source: Proposed NRRP Variation 4, Chapter 5: Water Quantity
24 November 2004
Allocation Limit (million m3): 15.9
Reason for Change: Implementation of 2nd Order approach as approved by Directorate
Source: Report U04/97
23 January 2004
Allocation Limit (million m3): 18.6
Reason for Change: This is the first estimate made
Source: 1st Order Report U04/02 (Table 6.2)