Outcome
A. Improving the health and well-being of waterbodies and freshwater ecosystems
Outcome measure

A2: Percentage of monitored river and stream sites graded D or E for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช concentration is decreasing

Target not met
How are we doing?
The percentage of monitored river and stream sites graded D or E for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช concentration increased slightly in 2025/26 (to 47%) compared to the 2023/24 year (44%).
A2: Percentage of monitored river and stream sites graded D or E for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช concentration is decreasing
Target not met

What we are measuring and reporting

Reporting annually on the percentage of monitored sites that are degraded.

Baseline measure

In 2023/24, the percentage of monitored sites that were degraded (D or E grades for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช) was 44 per cent.

To meet the target

The percentage of sites graded D or E for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช should be decreasing, relative to the baseline year.

This map shows river and stream sites monitored for E.coli in the Waitaha Canterbury region in 2025/26. Sites are coloured according to grades that predict the average risk of bacterial infection for swimmers from random exposure. Grades A, B, and C  (blue) correspond to infection risks of 1%, 2%, and 3% respectively. Grades D and E  (dark blue) correspond to infection risks greater than 3% and 7% respectively. 

E. coli grades at monitored sites for rivers and streams in 2023/24 compared to 2024/25 and 2025/26

This table shows the percentage of monitored river and stream sites assigned D and E grades for E. coli in 2023/24, 2024/25, and 2025/26 

Monitoring year 2023/24 baseline 2024/25 2025/26
Per cent graded D or E 44% 45% 47%

This table shows the percentage and number of monitored river and stream sites assigned A, B, C, D, and E grades for E. coli in 2023/24, 2024/25, and 2025/26. 

E. coli grades at monitored sites for rivers and streams 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Percentage Number of sites Percentage Number of sites Percentage Number of sites
A 31% 29 29% 30 32% 34
B 18% 17 18% 19 16% 17
C 7% 7 8% 8 5% 5
D 24% 23 26% 27 28% 29
E 20% 19 19% 20 19% 20
Totals (%; sites) 100% 95 sites 100% 104 sites 100% 102 Sites

Why are we measuring this?

E. coli monitored monthly throughout the year forms part of our long-term state of the environment programme for rivers and streams. Our long-term monitoring provides us with information about the overall state of water quality across our region. It is different to the monitoring and reporting we do for Can I Swim Here?, which focuses on popular recreation sites over the summer months only.  

E. coli is a type of bacteria commonly found in the gut of warm-blooded animals (including people) and is excreted in faeces. The presence of E. coli in rivers and streams indicates faecal contamination, and the possible presence of other pathogens that could be harmful to human health, causing infections such as gastroenteritis.

Sources of E. coli outside of the body typically include human or animal waste discharge, bird droppings and stormwater run-off. E. coli can survive for long periods in the environment. If land or soil is contaminated with E. coli, rainwater seeping through the soil or irrigation water running off land can carry the bacteria into rivers, streams or groundwater.

Under the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan (CLWRP), there are freshwater quality outcomes for E. coli as required by the current legislation at that time, namely the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 (NPS-FM) and the National Objectives Framework. When a site has exceeded health standards for E. coli, the water quality is not suitable for recreational activities involving contact with the water.

Monitoring and reporting on sites and concentrations of E. coli lets communities know about bacterial risk to swimmers and where we need to take further action to improve river water quality.

How do we measure the result?

We visit over 100 river and stream sites monthly to collect freshwater samples. We sample for a range of water quality parameters, including E. coli. The sites we monitor cover a variety of river types and locations, from large alpine-fed braided rivers to small spring-fed streams.

Sampling follows Environment Canterburyโ€™s standard procedures for the collection of freshwater quality samples, which is consistent with the National Environmental Monitoring Standard for river water quality sampling and data processing (NEMS, 2019). Water samples are sent to an accredited laboratory where they are tested using nationally approved methods. Lab results are electronically transferred to Environment Canterbury. Each monitored site is assigned a grade (Aโ€“E) which denotes the risk of bacterial infection, based on using E. coli concentrations as an indicator. Grades for a site are calculated based on the past five years of E. coli data using the attribute bands in Table 9 of Appendix 2A in the NPS-FM.

What work have we undertaken to contribute to this outcome?

As the regional council for Waitaha Canterbury, we work with ngฤ Papatipu Rลซnanga and our communities to set and implement environmental policies and rules that establish how resources, including river water, can be used sustainably. The NPS-FM and the National Objectives Framework set thresholds for both E. coli concentrations and the frequency that E. coli concentrations are exceeded based on infection risk through contact with river water. The CLWRP includes freshwater outcomes for E. coli in Canterburyโ€™s rivers based on values for human health.

Environmental regulation and protection is a core service of Environment Canterbury. To help achieve outcomes, we undertake targeted consent compliance monitoring around the region. Consenting helps to sustainably manage and protect our natural environment and resources. We aim to avert environmental risks before they become incidents and cause damage. We work with land managers, individuals, and industry to improve compliance and ensure positive long-term environmental outcomes.

Our state of the environment monitoring programme enables us to measure and report on changes in freshwater quality, including reporting on E. coli in rivers. Monitoring and reporting tells us whether the actions weโ€™re taking to address degrading water quality are having the desired effect over a reasonable timeframe.

Who else plays a role?

Central government sets policy direction at a national level for local authorities to implement through laws, national policy statements and environmental standards.

Water users are required to comply with the rules and standards set out in regional plans. Consent holders are responsible for complying with conditions in their resource consent that are designed to maintain and protect Canterbury's natural resources.

Many landholders and water users go well beyond simply adhering to the rules and strive to improve environmental outcomes for water through best management practices and active restoration. Many community organisations are involved in riparian and wetland restoration work and contribute to our understanding of the environment through citizen science.

Where can I find more information?

Data for monitored sites are updated annually on the Land Air Water Aotearoa (LAWA) website and River Quality topic.

You can also view our Water quality for contact recreation: Annual Summary Report 2024โ€“25 Season (JPG file, 106KB).

Download the 2024/25 results for A2: Percentage of monitored river and stream sites graded D or E for ๐˜Œ. ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช concentration is decreasing (PDF file, 393.8KB)

You might be interested in

We areย taking an integrated approach to resource management and as per 2025/26 Government direction, are developing a combined regional plan for Waitaha Canterbury.

We monitor the water quality at more than 100 of our region's favourite rivers, streams and beaches.

Check health warnings for Canterburyโ€™s rivers, lakes and coastal waters, and learn about toxic algae and water contamination before heading out.