New Zealand Rural Waste Minimisation Project
The Rural Waste Minimisation Project (RWMP) helps us to better understand the nature of waste on farms and to identify sustainable alternatives to burning, burial and bulk storage of waste.
Completed in 2018, the project was led by us together with the Ministry for the Environment, industry representatives, stakeholder groups and other regional councils. It was delivered by True North Consulting and Cherry Red Consulting.
A key aspect was developing collaborative, practical, solution-focused options for managing rural waste.
The emphasis was on encouraging long-term behaviour change by ensuring farmers could access convenient cost-effective services, rather than a regulatory approach.
- Pop-up events run by Agrecovery where farmers were able to drop waste and the collection of larger volumes of waste, such as silage wrap collected on farm by Plasback.
- Pilot events took place in Matamata and Geraldine with assistance from the Matamata-Piako District Council and the Timaru District Council.
The project’s one-stop shop model takes into account the needs and practices of busy farms and minimises barriers to collection by taking a customer-focused approach.
It provides flexibility by offering different levels of service depending on the number of waste farms generate (such as on-farm collection, fixed collection points and pop-up recovery events), and whether the farmer is more focused on maximising convenience or minimising cost.
Agrecovery has continued to offer the one-stop shop events throughout Canterbury with support from us and territorial authorities, and the concept continues to evolve.
In 2020, the Ministry for the Environment made agrichemicals and their containers a priority product under the Waste Minimisation Act.
Agrecovery is working to make the transition from a voluntary product stewardship scheme to a regulated product stewardship scheme in 2021.
We are now working with stakeholders toward solutions for other rural waste issues such as farm pits, household rubbish disposal, waste collection service expansion and dead livestock management.
The project successes include:
- Behaviour change whereby farmers engaged in increased recycling, recovery and appropriate disposal of waste streams.
- Reduced burning and burying of waste and associated impacts to land, water, and air.
- Increased engagement between industry, local government, community and partner organisations over rural waste management issues.
At the trials, a total of 87 participants contributed approximately 19,100 kg of waste products including:
- 5,000kg of agrichemical containers and drums,
- 2,782 kg of unwanted agrichemicals,
- 5,342 kg of unwanted oil, 2,030 kg of fertiliser bags and
- 4,000 kg of silage wrap.
Feedback at the pilots showed 100 per cent support for the one-stop shop approach from participants.
Key risks identified were:
- bioaccumulation/build up of contaminants in the ecosystem;
- leaching of soil contamination into groundwater and nearby waterways;
- quantities of wastes produced, particularly chemical wastes in dairy and horticultural activities; and
- the release of toxic gases from burning of wastes.
A lack of waste minimisation options was also identified as a major barrier to improving waste minimisation in rural areas.
Phase One reports
The findings of phase one informed Phase Two, which was focused on identifying a robust suite of simple, cost‐effective options for farmers and growers to help improve rural waste minimisation.
Identifying solutions involved simplifying waste streams into three categories:
- hazardous wastes such as agrichemicals and sharps;
- high volume recyclables such as hard and soft plastics; and
- low volume recyclables such as vehicle batteries and oil filters.
Waste streams were then split in terms of a strategic approach between low volume users and high volume users.
Going forward the broad strategy for high volume users is on-farm collection of waste.
For low volume users, the strategy is to provide a range of drop-off points for waste.
Phase Two reports
This phase of works will establish and deliver a number of rural waste collection pilots developed through milestones 1-4. Pilot collection schemes will be supported by a dedicated communications program with a focus on the implementation of new approaches and driving behavioural change.
Target audience and project outcomes; Farmers and growers are supported by convenient and low cost disposal options for waste generated on farms and understand why current waste management practices may be inappropriate and how they can better manage and minimise their waste by adopting new practices.
Phase Three Reports
- Implementation of preferred options and communications strategy
- Milestone 5 Report Final (PDF File, 1.27MB)
- Milestone 6a Report - Appendix 5 - TNC NZRWMP Milestone 6a Report (PDF File, 1.76MB)
- Appendix 6 - Rural Waste Minimisation Project - Milestone 6b Completion Report - True North Consulting (PDF File, 7.65MB)
Scoping studies and survey reports:
Farm surveys summary report and full report
- Non-natural Rural Wastes Site Survey Data Analysis Report: Full Report (PDF file, 11.67MB)
- Non-natural Rural Wastes Site Survey Data Analysis Report: Summary Report (PDF file, 2.7 MB)
- Non-natural Farm Waste Scoping Study Report (PDF file, 5.5 MB)
- Regional Assessment Report (PDF file, 4.99MB)
We undertook several studies in 2013 to gain an understanding of the quantities and types of waste generated on farms in the Canterbury region.
A cross-section of farm types (53 farms in total) were surveyed on the amounts of waste they produced each year and disposal methods.
The survey identified more than 50 different types of wastes with farms producing nearly 10 tonnes of non-natural rural waste each year.
The survey also confirmed that most farmers use burning, burial and bulk storage to manage the disposal of waste on farms.
The survey identified that the main barriers to effective rural waste minimisation are:
- Legacy farmer behaviour; it was acceptable in the past to burn and bury waste.
- Convenience; it is convenient to burn and bury wastes on farm in terms of time, cost, and effort required.
- Lack of alternatives; there is a lack of widely available, low-cost practical alternatives to disposing of wastes on farm.
Further research showed that most farmers want to protect their legacy and want to use more sustainable ways to manage the disposal of farm waste.