Outcome
K. Increasing the regional capacity and capability to respond to and recover from civil defence emergencies
Outcome measure

K1: Percentage score representing the capacity and capability of Civil Defence Emergency Management in the region to respond to and recover from emergencies is increasing

Baseline only
How are we doing?
This result remains at the baseline score for the 2025/26 reporting year. The Canterbury Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group's next evaluation has not yet been completed, as their assessment process is being reviewed alongside a national approach being developed by the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), which is expected to inform (and may in time replace) the regional tool used to set our baseline. Until this work progresses further, it isn't yet clear whether future K1 results will simply follow a different reporting cycle to our other outcome measures, or whether the underlying methodology and baseline will need to be revisited once the national approach is confirmed. We'll provide an update once this becomes clearer.
K1: Percentage score representing the capacity and capability of Civil Defence Emergency Management in the region to respond to and recover from emergencies is increasing
Baseline only

What are we measuring and reporting

We will be reporting annually on the capability and capacity of the Waitaha Canterbury CDEM Group (at a regional and district level) to respond to and recover from civil defence emergencies.

Baseline measure

The evaluation tool was implemented for the first time in 2025, so the current score is the baseline for future assessments to be measured against.

To see improvement

The average score for the Canterbury CDEM Group should be increasing, relative to the baseline year.

Why are we measuring this?

In a region with a history of severe flooding, the ability of the CDEM Group to respond to and recover from future events is critical for everyone living and working in Waitaha Canterbury. Following the North Island flood events in 2023, central government signalled a clear expectation for all regions across Aotearoa to strengthen their capacity and capability to respond effectively to civil defence emergencies.

How do we measure the result?

Each year, we assess the Group Office (regional) and territorial authorities (local) against a set of detailed performance measures. Emergency management staff from each council provide a score, with the Group Office supporting the process to ensure scores are applied consistently. 

We assess community awareness, preparedness and resilience by looking at improvements in individual and community readiness, increased understanding of hazard-related risks, and greater participation in CDEM activities.

We evaluate how effectively risks from hazards are being managed and reduced across Waitaha Canterbury. This includes assessing the coordination, promotion and accessibility of CDEM research; our understanding of the national hazardscape; the extent to which CDEM stakeholders are reducing risks from hazards to acceptable levels; and how well we support wider community participation in hazard risk management decisions.

We also contribute to the overall assessment of Aotearoa New Zealand’s capability to manage and recover from civil defence emergencies. This includes how we promote ongoing and coordinated professional development across the CDEM sector, how we strengthen the capacity of CDEM groups to prepare for and manage civil defence emergencies, and how we support agencies involved to manage the recovery process. As part of this, we measure the technological and operational readiness of our Emergency Coordination Centre and District Emergency Operations Centres.

The inaugural evaluation for Canterbury in 2025/26 identified collaboration and relational measures as particular strengths, along with governance and management arrangements for emergency management. Recovery is the weakest area for us as a region, and opportunities to improve business continuity management were also notable.

The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) is exploring how to evaluate and assure this at a national level. A consistent approach to measure response and readiness is expected to be developed over the next one to two years.

What work have we undertaken to contribute to this outcome?

Our work directly impacts and supports agencies across the region in preparing for and planning emergency management response and recovery. This includes our investment in flood protection schemes, the provision of emergency warnings and developing readiness and response plans. 

Who else plays a role?

The overall capability of local authorities and mana whenua, along with the decisions they make around emergency management, also play a key role in shaping how well communities are prepared for and able to respond to emergencies.

NEMA gives direction on civil defence and emergency management at a national level.

How does this link to our Climate Action Plan? 

This measure is directly linked to Action A in our Climate Action Plan Te Mahere Huringa Āhuarangi: Take a strategic approach to supporting local adaptation planning. This action aims to take a systematic and proactive approach to support the most at-risk communities in understanding, assessing and preparing for the impacts of climate change at the local and hāpori/community level, in partnership with mana whenua and Canterbury councils.  

K1 measures how well the region's civil defence and emergency management system is placed to do this. It assesses community awareness and preparedness, how well hazard risks are understood and reduced, and our ability to respond to and recover from emergencies. As climate change increases the frequency and severity of events such as flooding, wildfire and storms, stronger regional capability helps communities prepare for these impacts and recover from them. 

Find out more about our Climate Action Plan. 

Where can I find more information?

More information about Canterbury’s CDEM Group is available on their webpage.

NEMA also has lots of valuable resources.

Download the 2024/25 results for K1: Percentage score representing the capacity and capability of Civil Defence Emergency Management in the region to respond to and recover from emergencies is increasing (PDF file, 143.8KB)